2012 Goals

January 15, 2012

(First off, good job, WordPress, for not reminding me that the domain for this blog expired on December 31st.  Only discovered this now, two weeks after the fact. (Of course, if I was supposed to have something enabled to receive these reminders, someone please tell me.)

It has been almost six months since I wrote a blog post.  There were reasons for that absence – they were a melting pot of work, life, professional obligations, getting used to a new commute (I moved offices at the end of December) and a very nice vacation to see my family in Florida for Christmas. (Everyone in the Northern Hemisphere should spend Christmas in warmer climes at least once in their lives.  It may take some time to get used to, but when you do – boy, is it a lovely thing!) Within this potpourri were several questions about the effectiveness of another library blog, or even another blog at all.  Have blogs passed their prime? Are they really the most effective channel for communication, at least on the individual level?

I still see many wonderful personal blogs out there, both library blogs and otherwise, and their presence makes me reluctant to give up this blog completely.  Thus, I kick off 2012 with the list of annual goals, personal and professional.  Hold me to these, kids.

2012 Goals

Professional

1) Speak/present at, the minimum, one library conference.  I like getting my goals out of the way early, and this is one of them.  I will be presenting next week at the American Library Association Midwinter Meeting.  In 2011, I was part of a taskforce with the Reference and User Services Association (RUSA) to reform the organization and move communications to a more virtual arena.  I will be presenting out taskforce’s findings on Saturday, 21 December at the RUSA Board Meeting.  This meeting is open to all attendees, and I invite all librarians in my social circle to attend.  I’m hoping that I can squeeze something in for ALA Annual in Anaheim this June, even though most deadlines have passed.  The network of free webinars within ALA is also very deep, and I am also exploring that as a potential presentation avenue.

2) Use social media more effectively in sharing professional information. This means keeping up with both reading and writing blogs, my personal web portfolio, Twitter, Facebook and Google+.  I want to at least publish two blog posts related to library/information science/knowledge management issues a month.  In this, I have to balance my desire to share information and my stance on issues with my job and its position in the industry.  I must be careful not to give the impression that my views are reflective of my company, and if that means keeping my mouth shut on certain issues and concerns, difficult as it is, so be it.

3) Publish at least one article in professional channels (preferably peer reviewed). And here’s another one that I get out of the way early in the year!  In October 2011, Against the Grain approached me to write an article on what it has been like for me to have the MLS and work for a library vendor.  This should be published in their March 2012 issue.

4) Explore all avenues of professional growth, formal and informal. I’m hoping to work with different departments in my company on other projects that will have a distinct effect on the work of my department.  Closer to my actual work, which is now more global in nature, I hope to join the International Federation of Library Associations (IFLA) and begin development and service within that organization.  Networking with other librarians remains a key focus of my professional growth, be it talking with librarians at conferences or chairing new, less formal conference initiatives, such as ALA CraftCon.  CraftCon is ALA’s first ever mini-conference/unconference on DIY and crafts and how you can use them in your library.  It kicks off at ALA Midwinter with one hour each day of demos of different crafts.  I’ll be leading the knitting/crocheting hour on Sunday, 22 January from 3 – 4 PM in the Networking Uncommons, and all are invited to stop by.

5) Build technology competencies to remain competitive. In Fall 2010, I took a wonderful free online class through O’Reilly Media and createLIVE on XML. This year, I will be part of the Code Year initiative through Codecacademy.  I hope that this can lead to fulfilling goal #4.

6) Serve and chair/co-chair at least one American Library Association committee/taskforce/group. My time as chair of the RUSA Structure Taskforce will probably end this year.  Being a chair has helped build leadership skills and my knowledge base of the history of one of ALA’s larger divisions.  I am hoping to stay involved with RUSA, for they are a wonderful organization and have been very generous to me. (The current president took the time to write me a thank you note for my work on the Structure Task Force!  Seeing that note after a long day at work truly made my day and reaffirmed my commitment to membership.)  I’m also co-chair of the New Members’ Roundtable (NMRT) Student and Student Chapter Outreach committee and a member of the NMRT Online Discussion Group.  I hope to continue that work in this year.

7) Get elected to ALA Council. Running again, this time as a nominated candidate.  Wish me luck!

8) Find a cause for advocacy, and make that my personal library cause. Every great librarian I know has one cause or issue that they make their own – e-books, information literacy, library advocacy.  My “cause” will be alternative careers for the MLS, based in part on my own job search experience. I would like to become an advocate for these alternative careers.  In spite of the faults of library schools and LIS education, I do think the degree is worthwhile in part, and that there are good careers out there.  The change in the professional landscape means that students and new professionals are going to have to “think outside the box” when it comes to finding and landing a job.  I want to position myself as someone that can offer sound advice on career planning.

Personal – Health

1) Make and keep all medical appointments in 2012. Self explanatory.

2) Rest when ill or out of the office – don’t worry so much about work! American working culture puts guilt on the worker that actually takes a sick or vacation day – you’re not a team player if you’re not wedded to your job 24/7/365.  When I am home sick or on vacation, I have to put myself first.  The office will go on without you.

3) Find new avenues for exercise. I don’t have the time to run as much as I did when I was working part-time and unemployed, which means I need to supplement weekend runs (which will start again when the weather gets warmer) with something else. I tried yoga late in 2011 but injuries forced me to put it off for the last month of the year. I will go back to doing yoga in 2012, but look at other forms of exercise.

Personal – Knitting

1) Learn at least one new knitting skill. Done – I can now knit socks from the toe up and use Judy’s Magic Cast-On!  I would like to learn Magic Loop (knitting with one large circular needle) and knitting socks with two circular needles – because I have a bad habit of losing my DPN’s on the bus. :)

2) Learn to spin. The roving and spindle I bought last year from Highland Handmades is on top of my yarn stash bin, teasing me. I tried once with some roving I ordered from Amazon (note: Never. Do. That. Again!) and I need to try again.

3) Knit from Stash. I started this at the end of 2011, and it opened my eyes to the great stuff I have in those bins and baskets!

4) Buy less yarn. This follows from #3.  I was going to try to go an entire year without purchasing any yarn, which lasted all of two weeks.  (Malabrigo, you vile temptress!)  Assuming I have time to find a yarn shop in Dallas at ALA Midwinter, there will be some vacation yarn, but I hope to make that my only other yarn purchase until ALA Annual in Anaheim.

Personal – Other Hobbies

1) Build a kickass steampunk outfit. I fell in love with steampunk culture when Frank and I went to the 2011 Steampunk World’s Fair.  We’re going again this year, and I want an awesome outfit to show off.

2) Build a kickass Renaissance Faire outfit. Frank and I started this in 2011, and I want to make an even more great one for the 2012 faires we want to attend (New York, Tuxedo Park, Maryland, Pennsylvania).

3) Take up other crafts. I would like to learn how to sew, and there have been some other great projects (jewelry making, paper crafts) on various craft blogs.

4) Continue exploring cooking, with a focus on vegetarian meals. This one helps hen you have a boyfriend that loves to cook.  We have fun playing chef-sous chef together, like we did on New Year’s Eve.  Our salad, tortellini and garlic bread was delicious, and we both discovered the joy of parsnips as a salad ingredient.  The focus on vegetarian cooking is for both health and cost reasons (meat is expensive, yo!), and I love what I have found thus far, particularly with potatoes and soups.

Personal – Intellectual

1) Stay informed on politics. This is an election year, and I need to do this in order to make an effective, nonpartisan decision.  (And offer advice to my sister when she calls to ask who she should vote for!) I watch Meet the Press every Sunday morning (“If it’s Sunday…”) and I need to make time to watch all presidential debates this year.

2) Stay informed on local, national and international news. I cancelled my New York Times subscription out of cost and no time to read it.  I hope that keeping up with news via my iPad and TV will help fill that gap.

3) Make time to read. I have a longer commute, which means I should have more time to work on the 600+ books hiding in all sorts of places in the house.  Genres of interest for this year include fantasy and steampunk.

4) Learn to Code. I listed this one in my professional goals, but my desire to learn to code is a personal goal.  With the help of Code Year and Codecacademy, I want to make this happen.

Bookmark and Share


Where Are We Going to Watch the Lotto Now?!*: Are We Seeing the Death of Public Television?

July 2, 2011

This week marked the end of three longtime public television stations, one in New Jersey and two in Florida:

As a student of information, these developments sadden me.  Our news media has become so partisan and polarized, and while there was a time of restraint shortly after Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords was shot, these divisions in the media rear their ugly head once more (and will with the 2012 elections approaching).  The loss of unbiased (well, as unbiased as news media can get – there is inherent bias as not every station can cover every story) outlets of information, available over the air, is a loss for the citizenry.  These were not the first this year – KCET in Los Angeles went independent earlier this year, and WTTW (home of the infamous Max Headroom hacking incident in the 1980s) nearly lost its affiliation.   I am pleased that two more stations in Orlando are stepping up to the plate to provide public television coverage and that we will have the same in New Jersey.

Should librarians be concerned?  Of course!  A loss of an information portal is a loss to our profession and our beliefs in free information to all.

However…

As a New Jersey native and resident, I do not like that WNET (the public TV station serving New York City) and WHYY (the public TV station serving Philadelphia) pick at the NJN carcass.  Depending on where you live in the state, your community can receive little to no media coverage – an acute problem in my part of the state, Mercer County, as we are in the center of both media markets and rather than fight over who gets what, the NYC and Phila media seem to have opted for a “hands-off” policy.  New Jersey-centric news is available on News 12 New Jersey….which is only available via cable and satellite.  The loss of over the air television and radio that focuses on state issues is a loss for our unique identity.

I hope these are the last losses for public television. It is needed today more than ever.

 

 

* Actual comment to my father this morning upon reading of NJN’s last broadcast day in our newspaper.  NJN was home to the New Jersey Lottery drawings for as long as I can remember – in fact, when I was a kid, lotto drawings at 8 PM were followed by bedtime shortly thereafter.  Rumor has it that the drawings will only be available as webcasts, a great disservice to those who do not have/do not use Internet (like my dad and his mother).

Bookmark and Share

Go All In With Your Chips

February 16, 2011

I loved Michael Stephens’ Office Hours column this week, “Seek a Challenge:”

Coasting, in library school and in our jobs, is not an option. Sending students who have coasted through their LIS program to your library to coast perpetuates this problem. I can tell which students are merely sailing through their program, just as I can tell when a professor has “checked out” of his or her own job.

Students—are you doing the bare minimum in your LIS program? Are you turning in “good enough” papers that show no excitement, curiosity, or passion for librarianship? Or are you going above and beyond the expectations of your teachers? You get what you bring to your program.

The onus for change lies with both students and LIS faculty. Students should provide constructive evaluations of their learning experience. Faculty should respond with curricular changes and updated course offerings as quickly as possible. Library school administration should enable these conversations about change in an open, transparent process. LIS programs must be nimble and quick if they are to survive in the current economy.

It’s nice to see someone else (and someone with significantly more professional and academic clout than I) acknowledge this elephant in the room.  One of my gripes about library school was that it was the path of least resistance – students put in the bare minimum and walk away with the same grades as their more dedicated peers.  I resisted openly talking about this issue out of fear of coming across as smug.

Recent blog posts have discussed the need for change at the top, change at the bottom, change sideways, how to make the change, etc.   There’s no one golden ticket to reform/fix/transform LIS education.  It’s a collaborative effort.  All the stakeholders are going to have to ante up to the table and place your bets.  No one’s looking at their hand and folding, claiming they can’t do this or that for their students because of lack of funding, time, etc.

Whatever path to reform taken, there is one thing necessary – comprehension of the importance of challenge and personal growth.  Several of the librarians on Twitter have the rallying cry of  “#makeithappen.” I encourage you to go forth and do the same – go make something happen. Even if it’s a small self goal you tend to excuse off time and again, do it.  Once you conquer the smaller goals, the larger ones get easier.  And you might just be an inspiration to others.

Go all in with your chips, even when you don’t know what your opponent’s cards are.  Challenge yourself to be better, faster, stronger, smarter.   You and the world will be better for it.

Bookmark and Share


Get Online or Get Offline?

February 6, 2011

(Yes, I am blogging during the Super Bowl.  But with my teams out of the running, that train wreck called Christina Aguilera singing the National Anthem, and commercials that make me weep, I need a little professional writing to save my brain cells.  Kindly indulge.)

I’m fascinated by online learning.  My grad school had no online courses as a matter of principle, and my undergrad education was during the rise of the Internet.  I had my first online course this fall – a non-credit course in XML and Information Architecture.

Yet, it wasn’t a true “online course,” at least according to San Jose State University business professor Randall Stross.  It was a hybrid – part software (UStream and course website) and part human (instructor lecturing to the camera and a small in-person audience in Seattle).  Higher education is not at the pure online course yet (though it’s coming close, Carnegie Mellon University and the University of California have pilot programs in development).

I wonder what implications these experiments will have for information literacy instruction.  In job applications and interviews, we sing our tech praises, showing off our expertise in Camtasia and podcasting, thinking we’ll be the saving grace for the disaffected distance learner – only to find out that we lose sight of what CMU’s Candace Thille calls the “something motivating about the student’s relationship with the instructor — and with the student’s relationship with other students in the class — that would be absent if each took the course in a software-only environment.”    If online courses are notorious for high dropout rates, can the same be said for information literacy instruction?  When you take the person out of the equation – or reduce it to a voice over screenshots – is the learning still effective?

This is a gentle but foreboding reminder that technology is best used with careful consideration, never for its own sake. As I continue to look for library instruction jobs, it is advice I should always remember and consider in lesson planning.

Economic concerns, among others, are slowing the development of the pure 100 percent online course. And that might just be a good thing, for there is that certain passion lost in the online instruction:

Wendy Brown, the Heller professor of political science at the Berkeley campus, spoke witheringly of the idea at a campus forum in October: “What is sacrificed when classrooms disappear, the place where good teachers do not merely ‘deliver content’ to students but wake them up, throw them on their feet and pull the chair away? Where ideas can become intoxicating, where an instructor’s ardor for a subject or a dimension of the world can be contagious? Where scientific, literary, ethical or political passions are ignited?

You don’t see the “scientific, literary, ethical or political passions” directly in bibliographic instruction – but that instruction is key for finding those passions. And with the wrong information literacy course – the one without careful balance of technology and pedagogy – instructional technology is all for naught.

Bookmark and Share


The Opportunity Exchange

February 1, 2011

I was lucky with the library school I attended – location (New York City) and teaching philosophy (all in person classes) led to numerous professional and social opportunities.  Coupled with my high energy, try anything once, personality, Library Land was my oyster.

A conversation with an online friend reminded me of this blessing.  She’s in a small LIS doctoral program at Emporia State University – 100 percent online studies, and a very small cohort (10 students).   Coupled with where she lives (Arkansas), it’s very difficult for her to find opportunities for professional growth, publishing and speaking engagements, and networking.

It led me to wonder what we are doing – on personal and institutional levels – to create and exchange ideas? Listservs and social networking are great for sharing ideas, but are we talking to our like minded peers and letting those ideas grow into formalized projects?  Are library schools showing students the variety of opportunity they have with the LIS degree or just pigeonholing them into the library building?  Individually, are we taking risks to share ideas (controversial as they may be) and seek out growth opportunities when our personal situations are less than ideal? It’s one thing to “like” a friend’s library article on Facebook, but it’s another to express your opinion on that article.

In my three years in this academic sphere, I applaud the warmth and openness of my peers.  Nowhere else have I felt so welcome, even when still a student.  But nothing in life is perfect, and there is still room for growth in this profession.  I watch the events in Egypt with a cautious eye, wondering what lessons on creating change we can take from the energy and perseverance of these protesters. They risk arrest and perhaps death for sharing their views, but they press forward.  We have less in our profession on the line (at least in the First World) and all the chance to make it happen.  Are we?

Thus, I ask these questions:  What are you doing – personally or institutionally -  to create opportunity? And is it enough?

Bookmark and Share


From Generational Divide to Generational Grand Canyon

January 15, 2011

I believe all publicity is good publicity – a podcaster friend always reminds me “haters still count as a download.”  But, San Diego’s KPBS gave a clear example of pure bad publicity this week, in a piece profiling “librarian/stand up comedian” Meredith Myers timed to coincide with the ALA Midwinter Meeting hosted in their city this past week:

Young, Hip Librarians Take Over (January 10, 2011)

Reaction towards what was probably intended to give younger library professionals a larger voice and break down traditional librarian stereotypes was swift and negative. Public librarian Janie offered the following:

I am no longer “young and emerging”, but I am very open-minded, always seeking change and tech savvy.

I agree, and look to my mom for inspiration. Mom is of the boomer generation and quite competent with a computer. She has her own Facebook page, pays all her bills online, spends more time watching TV on her laptop than the 52 inch LCD TV in the family room, and was an early adopter of a cell phone.  She may not have a smartphone yet, but I would not be surprised if she decided to get one in the near future. (And her Generation X daughter will be more than happy to help her learn to use it!) I remember wise words from the HR director at my former law firm – “When you stop learning, you’re in the box.”  Flippant, but pointed – education is a lifelong process, and one’s age on one’s driver’s license should not be equated with the capacity to take on new technologies.  To do so is absurd and an insult to all who live up to Janie’s beliefs.

My problem with the KPBS article extends past the smugness and implied notion that the libraries needs the dreadlocked, Doc Marten*-wearing MLS to remain relevant in the digital age.  Where were Meredith Myers’ librarian credentials? She only talks about the profession in the vaguest of terms.  Nowhere does it mention where she works, her job title or duties, or if she even has an MLS. (Venturing over to her blog found that yes, she does have the MLS – she is a recent graduate of the University of South Florida – but does not have a job.) It would have lent our subject much more credit if she talked to KPBS about her studies, internships, work she actually did in a library, etc. rather than ambiguous statements that smack of ego. And why interview her at all, a woman who seems to be making more of her mark as a comedian and actress who just happens to have an MLS?  KPBS could have chosen from any one of the 83 ALA Emerging Leaders** or scores of other young librarians (thousands if you count virtual participation) to interview to show the good that young librarians are doing in our community.  Instead, they pick someone whose comments and attitude makes the generational divide worse.  As Buffy, an Emerging Leader mentor*** and school librarian, states:

“Young and hip” does not always equate with “innovative, thoughtful, smart, and passionate.” I really hate articles like this–I think they create additional stereotypes, polarize the profession, and don’t really focus on what IS changing the profession…I agree we need to put forth a positive image, but you need more than flash and “cool” to make the difference in the long run.”

John, an academic librarian, questioned on Twitter why there is even a perceived link between dress and commitment to change:

I don’t think older librarians “resistance 2 change” should b equated w/ lack of fashion sense. it’s silly.

School librarian Sara offers the same idea:

Substance triumphs over style. What makes me a good librarian who creates an inviting space for teens has nothing to do w/ my shoe choices.

Rather than go on ad infinitum about the generational divide as it is a known concern throughout the field, what solutions are out there? My fellow EL Brandon offered his own lessons from the workplace:

I learned awhile ago that, when it comes to moving the profession forward, doing my damn job and giving my patrons as much of what they want as I can is far more effective than wearing Jinx clothing and dying my hair purple.

Another Brandon over on Twitter shares similar thoughts:

Generally speaking though, wouldn’t hurt to work on image assuming the core competencies are being met and prioritized. (Emphasis mine.)

This is practical, simple, and profound advice.  In the movie Stand and Deliver (if you haven’t seen it, rent it and thank me later) math teacher Jaime Escalante encouraged his students to go past the socio-economic roadblocks in their way to find their ganas – their desire – to learn calculus. He was closer in age to parent than peer, though he and his students bonded on an ethnic and cultural level.   Escalante’s lesson can be applied to the library workplace.  Do your job, do it well, and project a positive, service oriented image and philosophy to patrons. Show your ganas from the moment you walk in to the moment you lock the front doors. Then it won’t matter whether you’re in dreadlocks or a cardigan and bun. (Just be sure you’re meeting your workplace’s dress code.)

Buffy’s final advice:

[M]ake a difference with what you do and how you treat people, not necessarily how you look.

KPBS may have had good intentions at heart, but did more harm than good.  I expected better from a public television station.  If anyone from the station is willing to speak with me on their rationale for this, I will be more than happy to grant you equal time. The media should know that what you see from KPBS will not be tolerated, and that librarians of all ages are eager, willing, and able to show you what we have done to make our libraries fun, engaging community spaces.

We already have a generational divide – let’s not make it a generational Grand Canyon.  Those kind of gaps are much harder to close.

 

 

* The misspelling of Doc Marten as “Doc Martin” was one of several basic errors throughout the piece, including what I thought was a very blatant one in the first paragraph – characterizing the Midwinter Meeting as “its national conference,” implying that there was only one association conference per year when in fact, there is two.

** Full disclosure: I am an ALA Emerging Leader.

*** Full disclosure #2: Buffy is one of my Emerging Leader project team mentors.

Bookmark and Share


Free? You mean F-R-E-E-E?

December 3, 2010

Who doesn’t like free stuff? Free wifi, free airfare, free food, free minutes…well, the list can go on and on.  One thing that librarians really should get excited about is free learning.   To quote an HR director in my previous life (law firm land), “when you stop learning, you’re in the box.”Crude, yes, but very very true.   In the 21st century, when technology makes learning ridiculously easy, there’s no excuse.  You can build your skill set from the comfort of your own home in your pajamas, or on your lunch hour.

If you don’t believe me, these two more eloquently written posts should sway you:

You can’t and won’t have time to learn everything you could possibly know for the position of librarian/information scientist/informationist provocateur*. and chances are you will be asked to do something at your workplace that you don’t know how to do, and you can’t call upon formal library school education to complete that task.  Thus it’s time to put on the thinking cap and take it upon yourself to learn a new skill – even if your job does not require it.

I do practice what I preach.  Since October, I’ve been taking an O’Reilly Media/createLIVE course on XML and Information Architecture. (While you’re there, look at some of their other course offerings; they’re very interesting.)  I don’t get any credit or certification for this, but I know it will make me indispensable in any future workplace, which is why I do it.   After three years of combining work and grad school you might think I am off the wall for diving right back into a class and homework (much less one where the benefit is not so obvious).  But, I press at it since I know that in the long term, giving up two hours each Tuesday afternoon for ten weeks** teaches me a skill I have wanted to learn for a long time, didn’t learn in library school, and will more likely than not use on some job in my informationist career.

So go off and take a free webinar (0r plan one for your institution if you have the chutzpah; Lori’s post gives some great tips).  You’ll be a better person for it.

 

* If you don’t know what I’m talking about, you need to listen to The Knitting Librarian Episode 13.  But I will tell you it has nothing to do with underwear.

** Including when I was on vacation in Florida.  I logged in for class from my parents’ lanai.

Bookmark and Share


So You Want to Go to Library School….

November 19, 2010

First off, a big HOW-DEE!! to my fellow 2011 ALA Emerging Leaders who may have just subscribed to this blog after our listserv exchange today. Please keep your arms and legs inside the car and enjoy the ride.

While I know the readership of the blog is ensconced in librarianship in some capacity, chances are you have someone in your life that is thinking about it, hopefully thanks to your indirect influence. Not sure what to tell them? I suggest pointing them to my friend and fellow librarian rock star Lisa’s blog series, So You Want to be A Librarian/Archivist. It’s thoughtful, intelligent advice coupled with frankness about the reality of the library job market. These are things I should have considered in my own “I want to go to library school” thought process, but that is often how we learn best – through experience, good bad and ugly.

It inspired me to give my own advice, from a mental/emotional perspective. Want to go to library school? Don’t go to library school if any of the following apply:

  1. You want to play with books all day. The work of a librarian goes beyond far beyond that, especially in the 21st century.
  2. Closely related to #1, you want to work in one kind of library or one geographic location for the rest of your life. We’re past that kind of economy. It died with ERA in the early 80s (if not sooner). And if you’re in library school now, get that idea out of your head, stat. It turned my stomach – and still does – when I hear students and recent grads tell me they won’t look for jobs “north of Poughkeepsie” (student lived in NJ) or know their destiny is to work in a public library.
  3. You’re having any sort of existential crisis, age-related or otherwise.
  4. You want something easy. Sure, it’s easier compared to other programs, but that says more about your work ethic than anything else, which leads me to believe you weren’t really cut out for college either.
  5. You just got laid off/fired and don’t know what to do with your life. Crisis is not the time to making significant life changes, and besides, you can live off severance/unemployment benefits for a time whilst you regroup.
  6. Your parents told you to do something constructive with your life or they would cut you off financially. (Seriously, someone stood up in my survey course and gave this as his reason for going to library school. And he received the same degree as I. But that rant is a whole other story.)
  7. You want to pursue another master’s course of study, but you’re scared of the GRE, and you have heard many library school programs don’t require it. (I took the GRE for a Ph.D admission application. It’s wickedly easy. In fact, I found it rather foolish to require the GRE for a Ph.D. program.)

Now, do go to library school if this applies:

You’re ready to work.

Whether or not you’re working in a library already, library school is going to teach you to work. It might not be the courseload, but you’re going to work.

  • You’re going to work at networking, real and virtual.
  • You’re going to work when it comes spiffing up your resume/CV/professional portfolio and reworking those same documents and websites over and over.
  • You’re going to work when it comes to conference attendance – meaning, you’re going to go even if it means foregoing vacations with friends.
  • You’re going to work to stay active in your student and local professional organizations.
  • You’re going to work on finding a job. I sent about 20 – 25 resumes when I graduated college. When I graduated from Pratt ten years later, I sent 156 before landing a part-time job.
  • You’re going to work on finding other opportunities to stay connected professionally, such as inventing your own projects. My podcasting workshops, and Lisa’s Dewey District Library study are examples of this. Position yourself as an expert in a topic related to libraries, someone who can open eyes and ears to knowledge – and doors will start opening for you.
  • And above all, you’re going to work on keeping yourself sane during this entire process – because it can and will get insane and depressing.

You’ve looked at that list and said, “sure, I’m ready to work.” Then welcome to library school, friend. :)

(As for the podcast, I’m hoping to get something out on the feed tomorrow before I leave for Thanksgiving with my family in Florida. We’ll see if this happens.)

Bookmark and Share


The Degree Dilemma

September 3, 2010

Andy Woodworth, Emily Lloyd and others have been weighing in on the very contentious debate over what an MLS actually means these days.  Inspired by their ideas and the related spirited* debate, I’m throwing my hat in the ring with two thoughts.

1) Give Me a Chance

Library service as we know it is changing – doesn’t matter what is causing the change (the economy, the Internet), but it is changing.  Thus, the days of separation of duties – “reference is done by x, circulation is done by y” are probably on their way out the door, if they haven’t left the premises already.  We are wasting our time quibbling over this.  Ruth Kneale asks the question,”why does it have to be versus?” and I agree.  If we spend time arguing over who does this or that, guess what? It’s time wasted. Work does not get done. The public suffers, for we are not fulfilling our mission to serve the public good.

Purists will throw their copies of the AACR at me, but I say let paraprofessionals handle some light MLS-type work if these two criteria are met:

  • If your library has paraprofessionals that are talented, dedicated, intelligent, and all around GOOD at what they do. In short, they’re good representatives of your library, people happy to come to work most days.
  • If this arrangement works for your library without significant disruption to your institutional mission, goals and objectives.

Emily says – “If ANY profession should value the self-taught, it’s this one,” and as one self-taught in many things in and out of the office, I believe this 100 percent.  But, take that second point seriously. It has to work for your library – “mileage may vary,” as Andy says.  Your library may feel comfortable having a parapro at the ref desk if you are a public library that does not receive complicated research questions.  This kind of arrangement is not something I would advocate in a Research I library frequented by faculty or graduate students.

Practical and personal example:  I temped in my law firm’s library two years ago, when the librarian went on maternity leave. I was  in my second semester of school with only one basic reference course in progress and two other core courses completed.  I was a paraprofessional although on the way to being professional.  I was not allowed to handle research questions from attorneys because administration was concerned my lack of research experience would translate into a liability issues.  (In layman’s terms:  Screw up one research question, and we lose a case and I lose my job.) By the end of my tenure there, I was allowed to handle some light research requests (i.e. pulling cases from Westlaw) after I had proven my capabilities and intelligence.  The more complicated work was sent to an outside research firm or handled by the main librarian at home when her time permitted. No one got hurt, and above all, the work got done.

Andy’s right – we have an image problem with the MLS when job duties get blurred, especially when the parapros are placed as Shining Examples(TM) beside their fully degreed coworkers.  But arguing over what a librarian and what a paraprofessional do does not answer reference questions or find books for kids who waited until the last minute for their summer reading assignments.  (The latter happened to me today.) Just do what you can for your library.  Be willing to bend and change.

Which brings me to my second point:

2) MLSPA? I Say Okay!

If you want to change the image of the MLS, it’s going to have to start at home, with a more rigorous curriculum.

(Pausing here for people to throw things at me.)

It goes without saying that reform in the library school curriculum is necessary and vital, especially if true blending of professional and paraprofessional work comes to pass.  I notice many “complaints” (for lack of a better word) of a lack of management skills in library education.  Thus, systems who want true managers often look outside the LIS field to gain that skill and find a great manager – but one who may not be familiar with the workings of a library.

I’ve been an advocate for some time on a combination MLS/MPA and hopefully will be able to pursue one myself, after seeing several friends in the University of Washington pursuing an MLS at the iSchool and an MPA at the Evans School for Public Affairs.  Whether they choose to go into traditional library work or not, all of them say to me how useful their Evans coursework is in libraryland.  And it’s not hard to see why – take a look at the core degree courses for the MPA (full MPA curriculum here):

  • Microeconomic Policy Analysis
  • Microeconomic Management Analysis
  • Managing Politics & the Policy Process
  • Managing Organizational Performance
  • Public Budgeting & Financial Management
  • Quantitative Analysis I & II
  • Public Policy Analysis
  • Program Evaluation

For further comparison, here’s the Rutgers University School of Public Affairs and Administration core curriculum. (I won’t list all their core courses as they have several concentrations, but theirs goes more in depth than UW’s and others I have seen, including courses in Technology and Public Administration, Administrative Morality, and Human Resources Management and Administration).

And here’s San Francisco State University’s MPA requirements (full curriculum here):

Essential Theories and General Skills

  • Introduction to Public Administration and Public Policy
  • Research Methods and Data Analysis I
  • Research Methods and Data Analysis II
  • Microeconomic Analysis for Public Administration
  • Policy-Making and Implementation

Essential Management Skills

  • Managing Organizational Behavior
  • Managing Human Resources
  • Managing Budgets in the Public Sector

Courses in policy writing, organizational management, budgeting and financial management – if you don’t believe those are necessary skills for librarians, here, have some nice oceanside property in Nebraska. Don’t want a full MPA or can’t afford it?  Check out a certificate in nonprofit management from the Evans School or SJSU’s Certificate in Nonprofit Management.

Now this kind of educational reform will be easier to implement this in library schools part of a larger university system, such as Rutgers or UW.  My UW friends tell me they can take electives throughout the university system, not just their particular schools. (If this has changed or if my understanding is incorrect, please comment.)  At my school (Pratt) this would be difficult since the entire institute has a very particular focus – art.  The solutions there might be adding additional courses or core requirements, but that’s money – and the argument over higher education as a business is an argument I don’t want to get into right now, for it’s out of scope.  Those like me who might be interested in such arrangements may be forced for now to pursue extra certificates or other degrees outside of our MLS until the change comes.  But the change needs to come, and it should sooner rather than later. It will address skills missing in today’s generation of librarians, and provide necessary change in the degree and job duties that is already in process but far from smooth.

Thoughts? Please leave in the comments. (But please play nice, everyone.)

*At times, “spirited” seems too light a word.  If you saw the Twitter exchanges this morning, you are apt to agree. :)

Share


Life Advice

August 16, 2010

Going slightly philosophical for a moment….

One of my favorite advice columns is written by Carolyn Hax, which I read in the Washington Post*.

This particular letter from last week struck me (excerpts below):

My younger sister and I are close, though we weren’t always. Recently she started dating a man that she will likely marry. Because of his position and family’s connections, she is getting to enjoy exciting, fun events that few people get to participate in. I am beginning to feel the little twinges of jealousy, not because I don’t want her doing these things, but because I would love to be enjoying these things with her.

For what it’s worth, I’m pretty satisfied in life overall, but sad that she gets to have all these exciting experiences while I work, sleep, eat, repeat. I don’t want to be this jealous person! Is there any magic to fighting off the green-eyed monster?

Carolyn’s response was one of my favorites (excerpt):

Chances are, in weighing someone you envy as a whole package deal, you’re going to hit something you don’t want — or, just something of yours you wouldn’t want to give up. Remember, if you really were Brad or Angelina, that means wiping out your loved ones, your childhood, your accomplishments, your finest hours, your first kiss, everything.

(You can read the full letter and response here.)

Of course I’m depressed about being unemployed, and envious/angry when I see classmates who do half the professional networking I do get full time jobs with minimal effort. Sure, I don’t like hanging around all day  in sweats and a t-shirt with a stain you just discovered, although it makes doing laundry easier (less to iron). It gets a bit pathetic when the highlight of your day is finishing the sudoku in the newspaper and being able to peel a peach successfully**.

But I have to back up and remember that if I want their life, there is something I have to give up – and when I look at the work I do – the blogging, the podcasting, my creativity, my drive – the connections I made, my accomplishments, I think I’ll stay unemployed in my stained KEXP t-shirt watching Mike Francesa on the YES Network with my dad, thankyouverymuch. At least for a little while.

And I’ll still keep going. I’ll get there.

* That’s one of the perks of the Kindle: easy, inexpensive access to newspapers from all over the world.

** This may have been where the T-shirt stains came from. The peaches I bought yesterday were quite juicy.

Share


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.